Can MUSASS definitions in GSO and @MUSASS definitions in the ACFFDR coexist?

Document ID : KB000032490
Last Modified Date : 14/02/2018
Show Technical Document Details

Issue:
 
Currently we have MUSASS definitions that were done in ACFFDR program(under the system programmers).  They have lost the resource that used to do this and they are asking that the ACF2 security administrator take over defining the MUSASS records using GSO.  Will I have any problems with MUSASS records being defined both ways on the same ACF2 database.  I want to know if I have to re-define the ones in ACFFDR under GSO?
 
Resolution:
 
ACF2 will allow the use of both formats at the same time.  If you have a duplicate entry in the GSO MUSASS record that is a match in the ACFFDR, the GSO record will take precedence.

Here is an example of an ACFFDR entry:
 
         @MUSASS   CICSCVT,MLID=CICS,CVTNAME=,FASTPTH=YES   
 
and a GSO record insert of a MUSASS:
 
INSERT MUSASS.MYMUSASS MUSID(MYMUS-) MLID(MYMLID1) CVTNAME(MYMUSCVT)
WORKSP(255) WORKLN(1024) CVTCOM FASTPTH CACHE CACHE#(5)